Premier League, game week 3 — UK time
Your appraisal — and now the market.
The table makes Fulham the bigger side: 11th against 15th of 20 last season. Against the block the other keeps: Fulham takes 1.93 points a game, Crystal Palace 1.20 -- the block form is Fulham's. +0.55 points a game is the venue form gap, in Fulham's favour: Fulham takes 1.75 a game at home over the last two seasons, Crystal Palace 1.20 away. Fulham scores heaviest in the 76-90+ spell and concedes heaviest in 46-60; Crystal Palace scores heaviest in 31-45+ and concedes heaviest in 31-45+. Averaging the two sides' own rates: over 2.5 goals in 52% of their games, both teams scoring in 52%, and a two-goal lead for one side or the other in 40%. On the record there is no strong lean either way on goals.
If the pattern holds -- and a pattern is a shape, not a promise: the first blow is even money on the record (16 of 40 and 17 of 40); a one-goal lead has not been safe in Crystal Palace's hands -- ahead without winning in 8 of 40; Fulham finds its goals latest of all -- 14 of its 49 after the 75th.
That read is built from the four steps, with no price in your ear -- the steps hold the evidence if you want the post-mortem. Now the market gets its say. Where it agrees with you it got there first; where it does not, your read and the crowd's disagree -- that is the conversation this tool exists to set up, and no measured edge backs either side of it.
The tissue is a plain goals model: Fulham 1.56 goals expected, Crystal Palace 1.08, from two seasons of scoring rates (20 home matches and 20 away in the bank), shrunk toward the division average. It is calibrated against nothing and claims no edge -- it exists to make your view concrete before the market speaks.
Our tissue: Fulham 2.06 (49%), the draw 3.96 (25%), Crystal Palace 3.82 (26%). The market's averages: 2.25, 3.30 and 2.91. The widest gap is on Crystal Palace: the market is shorter (2.91) than our 3.82 -- it rates that outcome more than we do.
Our tissue: over 2.5 2.04 (49%), under 2.5 1.97 (51%). The market's averages: over 2.5 1.90, under 2.5 2.01. Close to our view -- no argument either way.
Our tissue: yes 1.92 (52%), no 2.09 (48%). The market's averages: yes 1.67, no 2.07. The market is shorter than our number on yes.
For the 2UP offer the fact that matters is a two-goal lead for one team or the other at ANY point, not the final margin. In Fulham's own 20 home matches read, one appeared in 7 (35%). In Crystal Palace's own 20 away matches read, 9 (45%). Averaging the two sides' rates -- never pooling their matches -- that is 40% of games. No tissue is offered for this -- the played-match rates above are the honest read.
The market figures are the AVERAGE pre-match odds our feed records across books, not a best price -- a shaded average, so small gaps mean nothing.
Built 06:37 from matches completed before kick-off. The tissue is a model, not a measurement; the market figures are recorded averages, not offers. Nothing here is a tip or a selection.