Stenhousemuir is new to this division, so the rank comparison rests on less than a shared season. +1.40 points a game is the venue form gap, in Stenhousemuir's favour: Stenhousemuir takes 2.08 a game at home over the last two seasons, Livingston 0.68 away. Stenhousemuir scores heaviest in the 46-60 spell and concedes heaviest in 46-60; Livingston scores heaviest in 76-90+ and concedes heaviest in 76-90+. Averaging the two sides' own rates: over 2.5 goals in 43% of their games, both teams scoring in 47%, and a two-goal lead for one side or the other in 47%. On the record this leans a tight match.
How it may unfold
If the pattern holds -- and a pattern is a shape, not a promise: Stenhousemuir lands the first blow more often (31 of 48 to 17 of 50); when a lead builds towards 2UP it is more often Stenhousemuir's -- two goals clear in 13 of 48, against 7 of 50; a one-goal lead has not been safe in Livingston's hands -- ahead without winning in 12 of 50; Livingston finds its goals latest of all -- 16 of its 55 after the 75th.
That read is built from the four steps, with no price in your ear -- the steps hold the evidence if you want the post-mortem. Now the market gets its say. Where it agrees with you it got there first; where it does not, your read and the crowd's disagree -- that is the conversation this tool exists to set up, and no measured edge backs either side of it.
The tissue is a plain goals model: Stenhousemuir 1.89 goals expected, Livingston 0.61, from two seasons of scoring rates (24 home matches and 25 away in the bank), shrunk toward the division average. It is calibrated against nothing and claims no edge -- it exists to make your view concrete before the market speaks. Note: Stenhousemuir's figures include last season in the Scottish League One, where goals came against different company; Livingston's figures include last season in the Scottish Premiership, where goals came against different company.
Our numbers against the market’s
Match result
Our tissue: Stenhousemuir 1.47 (68%), the draw 4.81 (21%), Livingston 8.97 (11%). The market's averages: 3.75, 3.60 and 1.75. The widest gap is on Stenhousemuir: the market offers 3.75 against our 1.47. If our figures are right that is value; nothing proves they are.
Over or under 2.5 goals
Our tissue: over 2.5 2.20 (45%), under 2.5 1.83 (55%). The market's averages: over 2.5 1.75, under 2.5 2.05. The market is shorter than our number on over 2.5.
Both teams to score
Our tissue: yes 2.59 (39%), no 1.63 (61%). The market's averages: yes 1.67, no 2.10. The market is shorter than our number on yes.
The 2UP fact
For the 2UP offer the fact that matters is a two-goal lead for one team or the other at ANY point, not the final margin. In Stenhousemuir's own 24 home matches read, one appeared in 10 (42%). In Livingston's own 25 away matches read, 13 (52%). Averaging the two sides' rates -- never pooling their matches -- that is 47% of games. No tissue is offered for this -- the played-match rates above are the honest read.
The market figures are the AVERAGE pre-match odds our feed records across books, not a best price -- a shaded average, so small gaps mean nothing.
Built 21:02 from matches completed before
kick-off. The tissue is a model, not a measurement; the market
figures are recorded averages, not offers. Nothing here is a tip
or a selection.