Scottish Premiership, game week 5 — UK time
Your appraisal — and now the market.
Kilmarnock and St. Mirren finished near neighbours last season -- 10th and 11th of 12 -- so rank alone splits nothing here. Against the block the other keeps: Kilmarnock takes 1.75 points a game, St. Mirren 1.08 -- the block form is Kilmarnock's. +0.39 points a game is the venue form gap, in Kilmarnock's favour: Kilmarnock takes 1.19 a game at home over the last two seasons, St. Mirren 0.80 away. Kilmarnock scores heaviest in the 31-45+ spell and concedes heaviest in 76-90+; St. Mirren scores heaviest in 76-90+ and concedes heaviest in 76-90+. The shapes mesh: St. Mirren's strongest scoring spell is exactly where Kilmarnock is softest. Averaging the two sides' own rates: over 2.5 goals in 50% of their games, both teams scoring in 46%, and a two-goal lead for one side or the other in 61%. On the record there is no strong lean either way on goals.
If the pattern holds -- and a pattern is a shape, not a promise: the first blow is even money on the record (15 of 41 and 17 of 41); when a lead builds towards 2UP it is more often Kilmarnock's -- two goals clear in 11 of 41, against 5 of 41; a one-goal lead has not been safe in Kilmarnock's hands -- ahead without winning in 8 of 41; a one-goal lead has not been safe in St. Mirren's hands -- ahead without winning in 9 of 41; St. Mirren finds its goals latest of all -- 10 of its 36 after the 75th, and Kilmarnock concedes most in that same spell; the last quarter-hour is where this fixture's money is likeliest to move.
That read is built from the four steps, with no price in your ear -- the steps hold the evidence if you want the post-mortem. Now the market gets its say. Where it agrees with you it got there first; where it does not, your read and the crowd's disagree -- that is the conversation this tool exists to set up, and no measured edge backs either side of it.
The tissue is a plain goals model: Kilmarnock 1.47 goals expected, St. Mirren 1.48, from two seasons of scoring rates (21 home matches and 20 away in the bank), shrunk toward the division average. It is calibrated against nothing and claims no edge -- it exists to make your view concrete before the market speaks.
Our tissue: Kilmarnock 2.67 (37%), the draw 4.08 (25%), St. Mirren 2.63 (38%). The market's averages: 2.70, 3.40 and 2.50. The widest gap is on the draw: the market is shorter (3.40) than our 4.08 -- it rates that outcome more than we do.
Our tissue: over 2.5 1.76 (57%), under 2.5 2.31 (43%). The market's averages: over 2.5 1.82, under 2.5 1.90. Close to our view -- no argument either way.
Our tissue: yes 1.68 (60%), no 2.47 (40%). The market's averages: yes 1.62, no 2.15. Close to our view -- no argument either way.
For the 2UP offer the fact that matters is a two-goal lead for one team or the other at ANY point, not the final margin. In Kilmarnock's own 21 home matches read, one appeared in 14 (67%). In St. Mirren's own 20 away matches read, 11 (55%). Averaging the two sides' rates -- never pooling their matches -- that is 61% of games. No tissue is offered for this -- the played-match rates above are the honest read.
The market figures are the AVERAGE pre-match odds our feed records across books, not a best price -- a shaded average, so small gaps mean nothing.
Built 17:04 from matches completed before kick-off. The tissue is a model, not a measurement; the market figures are recorded averages, not offers. Nothing here is a tip or a selection.