Match result
Our tissue: Manchester City Women 1.26 (79%), the draw 7.69 (13%), Liverpool Women 13 (8%). The market's averages: ?, ? and ?. Not every market price is recorded yet -- check nearer kick-off.
Women's Super League, game week 3 — UK time
Your appraisal — and now the market.
The table makes Manchester City Women the bigger side: 1st against 11th of 12 last season. Against the block the other keeps: Manchester City Women takes 2.78 points a game, Liverpool Women 0.12 -- the block form is Manchester City Women's. +2.33 points a game is the venue form gap, in Manchester City Women's favour: Manchester City Women takes 3.00 a game at home over the last two seasons, Liverpool Women 0.67 away. Manchester City Women scores heaviest in the 76-90+ spell and concedes heaviest in 61-75; Liverpool Women scores heaviest in 1-15 and concedes heaviest in 76-90+. The shapes mesh: Manchester City Women's strongest scoring spell is exactly where Liverpool Women is softest. Averaging the two sides' own rates: over 2.5 goals in 62% of their games, both teams scoring in 56%, and a two-goal lead for one side or the other in 54%. On the record this leans a goals match.
If the pattern holds -- and a pattern is a shape, not a promise: Manchester City Women lands the first blow more often (19 of 24 to 9 of 24); when a lead builds towards 2UP it is more often Manchester City Women's -- two goals clear in 13 of 24, against 5 of 24; a one-goal lead has not been safe in Liverpool Women's hands -- ahead without winning in 4 of 24; Manchester City Women finds its goals latest of all -- 15 of its 69 after the 75th, and Liverpool Women concedes most in that same spell; the last quarter-hour is where this fixture's money is likeliest to move.
That read is built from the four steps, with no price in your ear -- the steps hold the evidence if you want the post-mortem. Now the market gets its say. Where it agrees with you it got there first; where it does not, your read and the crowd's disagree -- that is the conversation this tool exists to set up, and no measured edge backs either side of it.
The tissue is a plain goals model: Manchester City Women 2.82 goals expected, Liverpool Women 0.78, from two seasons of scoring rates (12 home matches and 12 away in the bank), shrunk toward the division average. It is calibrated against nothing and claims no edge -- it exists to make your view concrete before the market speaks.
Our tissue: Manchester City Women 1.26 (79%), the draw 7.69 (13%), Liverpool Women 13 (8%). The market's averages: ?, ? and ?. Not every market price is recorded yet -- check nearer kick-off.
Our tissue: over 2.5 1.43 (70%), under 2.5 3.30 (30%). The market has not recorded both sides of this line yet.
Our tissue: yes 1.96 (51%), no 2.04 (49%). The market has not recorded both sides of this line yet.
For the 2UP offer the fact that matters is a two-goal lead for one team or the other at ANY point, not the final margin. In Manchester City Women's own 12 home matches read, one appeared in 8 (67%). In Liverpool Women's own 12 away matches read, 5 (42%). Averaging the two sides' rates -- never pooling their matches -- that is 54% of games. No tissue is offered for this -- the played-match rates above are the honest read.
The market figures are the AVERAGE pre-match odds our feed records across books, not a best price -- a shaded average, so small gaps mean nothing.
Built 00:01 from matches completed before kick-off. The tissue is a model, not a measurement; the market figures are recorded averages, not offers. Nothing here is a tip or a selection.